Disclaimer: The web pages here are my personal work, results and comments of my own experience and research. I am not associated with any political party or sect. Please let me know if there are any errors in my content. As a child in the 60s, I was very weird, in the days before "autism" was recognized. Today I am partially cured but still suffer from social phobia and my communication skills, including writing, are not very good. This article was slowly developed over a very long time. This needs to be rewritten/restructured one day. RRG2020
"The Universe according to Rangutan - A very logical explanation of gravity" by Rudolf
(Revival and expansion of the "Le Sage Gravitation Theory" and combining it with the theory of black hole evaporation)
"Gravity to me is a 3D observable result of a 4D* undetectable universal wind!" RRG1988
* the fourth dimension is freqeuncy!
" The current research into gravity is like looking for your reflection in a pool of mud" RRG2022
Pretty absurd that two objects on either side of the universe should magically ‘attract’ each other. I am afraid that all scientists are delirious about gravity. Since childhood I have questioned everything I am told, and always sought to research/explain every mystery of life, with success. In 1988 I first envisioned what gravity really is, the current theories have bothered me all my life. Till today, I have positive reactions for my theories from friends but zero response from scientists, I assume they are silent as not to be ridiculed by peers for thinking differently?
I claim that gravity is a push force, not a pull force, and that gravity is caused by a tachyon-like wind. There are millions of black holes, turning the nuclei of
atoms into tiny but powerful subatomic particles, likely quantum particles, radiating out from the poles in a funnel like field. The particles are either ejected at speeds greater than that
of light, or/and, have an incredible high frequency not yet detectable. This means that, possibly, dark energy is "RADIATING GRAVITONS" = TACHYONS ... and Gravity is the result of this
radiation/energy reacting with the atoms of an object of mass.
We cannot detect this ‘cumulated-universal-radiation’ with equipment made of matter, the tachyons travel through atoms. It is their field, on passing near or through an atom, or collision, that causes the pushing force on masses. Direct collisions of tachyons with electrons may cause the building of atoms of higher mass, or collisions with nuclei, the decay of atoms? This collective multi-frequency, powerful radiation "rains" on us evenly and constantly, pushing us and objects down onto the surface of the Earth, in the direction towards the center of the Earth or any other large body in space. What stops the tachyons? I claim that tachyons are stopped by the nuclei of atoms and become new particles of the nuclei, increasing the mass of an atom and eventually creating heavy metals.
We are shielded from the pushing forces from the other side of the Earth due to the dense core. The resultant force is then classically seen as attraction, but is
really the resultant forces pushing two objects together. Likewise, the Earth and other planets are ‘pushed’ towards the Sun (offset by forces of revolution) and similarly our solar system
spirals toward the center of our galaxy. Some tachyons are deflected sideways, causing magnetic fields?
This effect explains why the universe is expanding. Tachyon radiation pushes, like solar wind does, but more powerful. We are lucky to be near the center of the universe and have a stable gravitational constant, not (unaware) the same all over the universe. On the outskirts of the universe, galaxies are therefore being pushed away from us with increasing speeds!.
If one is looking for an anti-gravitational method then the shield should not be between the two masses but a shield above the smaller object, an anti-tachyon
"umbrella", made of spinning metal plates or a protection field?
This theory is an upgrade of that by George-Louis Le Sage, 1747.
The term "tachyon" was coined by Gerald Feinberg in 1967.
Nikola Tesla called this energy "free energy" or "ether" in 1938
Stephen Hawking suggested black hole evaporation in 1974 but never knew what it is or what is causes!
Einstein was not happy with his theories. Fine in mathematics, but something was missing!
Consequences: (to be expanded)
Einstein was wrong about ONE thing, time and space are NOT bound! This is why he died confused and frustrated?
Einstein: "Space and time are fluid, affected by gravity and your speed. " WTF!
Rangutan: "Time is fixed and space dimensions are fixed. Speed is variable. Traveling faster, your atom orbits (and that of your clock) are elongated causing them to slow, therefore slowing time.
A Theory of how "Dark Energy" is produced by Rangutan
Experiment 1 (complicated): The Casimir Effect https://physicsworld.com/a/the-casimir-effect-a-force-from-nothing/
Experiment 2 (simple): The gravitational shield must be like an umbrella between the object and space, not between two masses!
They say light is a wave and matter. Well light is ONLY moving matter, radiating photons, shot from a source at a certain rate. The frequency is the amount of photos passing/striking an object. They are spinning so have a field? The illusion comes from when detecting radiation on apparatus, the passing photons show as a wave on the screen but their movement is NOT in a wave form like ripples on water. Photos and tachyons are shot from their source like bullets from machine-gun. There is nothing physical to what they call "light-waves", just as silly as talking about a "wave of bullets" or "wave of refugees"! Similarly, the radiation of tachyons is NOT a wave but a type of wind, the effect on solid matter is called "gravity". The effect of light on solid matter is called "heat".
RRG 2019 cc www.rangutan.eu
Scientists confused because they think gravity "pulls". No, it pushes objects together in the center of the universe and apart on the outside of the universe.
See also partial explanation in the book "Gravity is a Push" by Walter C. Wright
I have not read this book yet. I found the title and author recently.
More about Walter C. Wright > researching ....