Disclaimer: The web pages here are my personal work, results and comments of my own experience and research.  I am not associated with any political party or sect.  Please let me know if there are any errors in my content. As a child in the 60s, I was very weird, in the days before "autism" was recognized. Today I am partially cured but still suffer from social phobia and my communication skills, including writing, are not very good. This article was slowly developed  over a very long time. This needs to be rewritten/restructured one day. RRG2020

"The Universe according to Rangutan - A very logical explanation of gravity" by Rudolf Graspointner


(Revival and expansion of the "Le Sage Gravitation Theory" and combining it with the theory of black hole evaporation)


"Gravity to me is a 3D observable result of a 4D* undetectable universal wind!"  RRG1988

* the fourth dimension is freqeuncy!


" The current research into gravity is like looking for your reflection in a pool of mud" RRG2022





Pretty absurd that two objects on either side of the universe should magically ‘attract’ each other. I am afraid that all scientists are delirious about gravity. Since childhood I have questioned everything I am told, and always sought to research/explain every mystery of life, with success. In 1988 I first envisioned what gravity really is, the current theories have bothered me all my life. Till today, I have positive reactions for my theories from friends but zero response from scientists, I assume they are silent as not to be ridiculed by peers for thinking differently?



I claim that gravity is a push force, not a pull force, and that gravity is caused by a tachyon-like wind. There are millions of black holes, turning the nuclei of atoms into tiny but powerful subatomic particles, likely quantum particles,  radiating out from the poles in a funnel like field. The particles are either ejected at speeds greater than that of light, or/and, have an incredible high frequency not yet detectable. This means that, possibly, dark energy is "RADIATING GRAVITONS" = TACHYONS ... and Gravity is the result of this radiation/energy reacting with the atoms of an object of mass.



We cannot detect this ‘cumulated-universal-radiation’ with equipment made of matter, the tachyons travel through atoms. It is their field, on passing near or through an atom, or collision, that causes the pushing force on masses. Direct collisions of tachyons with electrons may cause the building of atoms of higher mass, or collisions with nuclei, the decay of atoms? This collective multi-frequency, powerful radiation "rains" on us evenly and constantly, pushing us and objects down onto the surface of the Earth, in the direction towards the center of the Earth or any other large body in space. What stops the tachyons? I claim that tachyons are stopped by the nuclei of atoms and become new particles of the nuclei, increasing the mass of an atom and eventually creating heavy metals. 


We are shielded from the pushing forces from the other side of the Earth due to the dense core. The resultant force is then classically seen as attraction, but is really the resultant forces pushing two objects together.  Likewise, the Earth and other planets are ‘pushed’ towards the Sun (offset by forces of revolution) and similarly our solar system spirals toward the center of our galaxy. Some tachyons are deflected sideways, causing magnetic fields?


This effect explains why the universe is expanding. Tachyon radiation pushes, like solar wind does, but more powerful. We are lucky to be near the center of the universe and have a stable gravitational constant, not (unaware) the same all over the universe. On the outskirts of the universe, galaxies are therefore being pushed away from us with increasing speeds!. 


If one is looking for an anti-gravitational method then the shield should not be between the two masses but a shield above the smaller object, an anti-tachyon "umbrella", made of spinning metal plates or a protection field?


This theory is an upgrade of that by George-Louis Le Sage, 1747. 

The term "tachyon" was coined by Gerald Feinberg in 1967. 

Nikola Tesla called this energy  "free energy" or "ether" in 1938

Stephen Hawking suggested black hole evaporation in 1974 but never knew what it is or what is causes!

Einstein was not happy with his theories. Fine in mathematics, but something was missing!


 Consequences: (to be expanded)

  •  explains where the mass goes in black-holes.
  •  tachyons likely become part of a nucleus when captured by an atom, increasing the atomic number                   H>He>>>>>Fe>>>>>Ag>>>>>
  •  dark-energy is tachyon radiation.
  •  dark-matter is non-radiating, no star-light, not active, dust and gases.
  •  solution to anti-gravity is a shield ABOVE the smaller object, not BETWEEN the objects.
  •  explains why the universe is expanding at an accelerating pace.
  •  we are near the center of the universe where things are pretty stable.
  •  our gravitational constant applies to our local group of galaxies only.
  •  the gravitational constant is proportional to the flux of tachyon radiation, differs in parts of the universe.
  •  galaxies on the outskirts of the universe are elliptical towards the outer rim of the universe.
  •  compare speed, frequency and momentum/energy of electrons, photons, x-ray, gamma-ray, neutrino and     tachyons
  •  disputes the space-time model
  •  disputes electromagnetic “waves”. Really, photons etc are like bullets from a machine-gun. When they pass a   detector, they show a wave-like energy pattern on measuring equipment. The flow rate of the particles determine the "frequency".
  •  tachyons cannot be “seen” or detected by conventional equipment, too fast or too furious (frequency)!
  •  a man-made mini black-hole could improve communicate power and speed.
  •  if material or star-input runs-out, the black-hole dies out!
  •  explains a lot of weird astronomical observations

Space-Time BS:

Einstein was wrong about ONE thing, time and space are NOT bound!  This is why he died confused and frustrated?

Einstein: "Space and time are fluid, affected by gravity and your speed. " WTF!

Rangutan: "Time is fixed and space dimensions are fixed. Speed is variable. Traveling faster, your atom orbits (and that of your clock) are elongated causing them to slow, therefore slowing time.  


A Theory of how  "Dark Energy" is produced by Rangutan



Experiment 1 (complicated): The Casimir Effect https://physicsworld.com/a/the-casimir-effect-a-force-from-nothing/

Experiment 2 (simple): The gravitational shield must be like an umbrella between the object and space, not between two masses!

  • Find a large sensitive scale.
  • Buy ~100 computer hard-discs with high spinning rates
  • Weigh the raw unconnected discs
  • Secure against foreign forces
  • Weigh the discs when running/spinning
  • The difference in weight should prove a gravitational-shielding-principle.
  • The spinning discs are refracting incoming universal radiation like tachyons, therefore reducing gravity? 



They say light is a wave and matter. Well  light is ONLY moving matter, radiating photons, shot from a source at a certain rate. The frequency is the amount of  photos passing/striking an object.  They are spinning so have a field? The illusion comes from when detecting radiation on apparatus, the passing photons show as a wave on the screen but their movement is NOT in a wave form like ripples on water.  Photos and tachyons are shot from their source like bullets from machine-gun. There is nothing physical to what they call "light-waves", just as silly as talking about a "wave of bullets" or "wave of refugees"! Similarly, the radiation of tachyons is NOT a wave but a type of wind, the effect on solid matter is called "gravity". The effect of light on solid matter is called "heat".


RRG 2019 cc  www.rangutan.eu


Scientists confused because they think gravity "pulls". No, it pushes objects together in the center of the universe and apart on the outside of the universe.

 Why my theory will never be accepted as science: Academia only accept ideas in peer-reviewed papers!https://twitter.com/JamesMelville/status/1580649596232949762?s=20&t=xdkQkTtIJXmTMesl5E8CDg


See also a similar claim in the book "Gravity is a Push" by Walter C. Wright

I have not read this book yet. I found the title and author's name recently.

More about Walter C. Wright  > researching ....


Free counters!